Code Review


0:00
0:00

Code Review Best Practices at FAANG Companies (2025)

These tables capture the main points and trends in code review practices at FAANG companies as of 2025, highlighting the integration of AI, automation, security, and company-specific approaches.

General Code Review Best Practices (2025)

Serial No.Best PracticeDescription (2025)
1Understand Importance of Code ReviewsEssential for high code quality, early bug detection, knowledge sharing; focus on continuous improvement over perfection.
2Conduct Thorough Yet Efficient ReviewsPrioritize core logic and architecture; use automation for style/routine checks; reviewers should have relevant expertise.
3Focus on Enhanced Key AreasEmphasize security (auth/data), AI-assisted analysis, automated security scans, performance, scalability, and infrastructure-as-code reviews.
4Provide AI-Enhanced Constructive FeedbackUse AI tools for context-aware suggestions and automated feedback; combine AI with human judgment for best results.
5Leverage Automation for Speed and QualityEmploy automated tools (static analysis, code standards enforcement, instant checks); modern tools show high user satisfaction and reduced outdated rates.
6Continuous Learning with Data-Driven MetricsUse data flywheel: user feedback, monitor outdated rates, daily accuracy labeling, and AI tools that adapt to team patterns.

New Additions and Trends in 2025

Practice/TrendDetails
AI-Human Hybrid WorkflowAI provides initial analysis; humans focus on complex decisions. GitHub Copilot offers instant AI feedback while waiting for human review.
Security-First Review CultureSecurity reviews are prioritized; Security Level Agreements (SLAs) define vulnerability detection and resolution times; focus on OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities.
Multi-Model AI IntegrationUse of multiple AI models (e.g., Claude 3.7 Sonnet, OpenAI o1, Google Gemini 2.0 Flash) for specialized review tasks.
Real-Time Collaborative ReviewPlatforms support real-time sessions, AI PR summaries, chat-based discussions, and instant feedback loops to minimize delays.

Company-Specific Practices (2025)

CompanyDistinct Practices
GoogleContinuous improvement over perfection, data-driven decisions, escalation for conflicts, lightweight/fast AI-assisted reviews.
Meta/FacebookAI-driven testing, shift-left approach, automated regression testing, feature flags, dark launches, canary deployments for production testing.
AmazonEnhanced CodeGuru Security, security-focused best practices, integrated automation for review orchestration.
ByteDance/TikTokBitsAI-CR system (75% accuracy), two-stage architecture (RuleChecker, ReviewFilter), metric tracking (Outdated Rate).
AppleUses iOS-specific tools (SwiftLint, Danger) for code review.
NetflixInfrastructure-as-code review practices for cloud-native architecture.

Modern Tools and Technologies (2025)

Tool/PlatformPurpose/Features
GitHub Copilot Code ReviewAI-powered, integrated into GitHub, provides instant suggestions and one-click fixes.
CodacyAutomated quality gates, supports 40+ languages.
DeepCode by SnykSecurity-focused AI code analysis.
Amazon CodeWhispererAWS-integrated code assistance.
Bito's AI Code Review AgentContext-aware recommendations, incremental review.
CodeAnt AISOC2/HIPAA compliant, reduces review time by 50%.
SonarQubeEnhanced security vulnerability detection.
DangerAutomated enforcement of routine review rules.

Key Challenges and Considerations (2025)

ChallengeDescription
AI Tool IntegrationBalancing AI automation with human expertise.
Security ComplianceMeeting stricter regulatory and security requirements.
Scale ManagementHandling reviews across very large developer teams.
Tool FragmentationManaging multiple specialized review tools.
False Positive ReductionImproving AI accuracy to minimize unnecessary alerts.

Security-Focused Practices

AspectPractice
Security ReviewsPrioritize high-risk code (auth, data), early SAST/SCA tool integration, focus on OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities.
SLAsDefine detection and resolution times for vulnerabilities.
Automated ScansIntegrate automated security scans into code review pipelines.

AI & Automation Metrics

Metric/FeatureValue/Impact
BitsAI-CR Review Accuracy75%
Outdated Rate (BitsAI-CR)26.7%
User Satisfaction74.5%
CodeAnt AI Review Time50% reduction

Last updated on July 3, 2025

🔍 Explore More Topics

Discover related content that might interest you

TwoAnswers Logo

Providing innovative solutions and exceptional experiences. Building the future.

© 2025 TwoAnswers.com. All rights reserved.

Made with by the TwoAnswers.com team