Code Review
0:000:00
Code Review Best Practices at FAANG Companies (2025)
These tables capture the main points and trends in code review practices at FAANG companies as of 2025, highlighting the integration of AI, automation, security, and company-specific approaches.
General Code Review Best Practices (2025)
Serial No. | Best Practice | Description (2025) |
---|---|---|
1 | Understand Importance of Code Reviews | Essential for high code quality, early bug detection, knowledge sharing; focus on continuous improvement over perfection. |
2 | Conduct Thorough Yet Efficient Reviews | Prioritize core logic and architecture; use automation for style/routine checks; reviewers should have relevant expertise. |
3 | Focus on Enhanced Key Areas | Emphasize security (auth/data), AI-assisted analysis, automated security scans, performance, scalability, and infrastructure-as-code reviews. |
4 | Provide AI-Enhanced Constructive Feedback | Use AI tools for context-aware suggestions and automated feedback; combine AI with human judgment for best results. |
5 | Leverage Automation for Speed and Quality | Employ automated tools (static analysis, code standards enforcement, instant checks); modern tools show high user satisfaction and reduced outdated rates. |
6 | Continuous Learning with Data-Driven Metrics | Use data flywheel: user feedback, monitor outdated rates, daily accuracy labeling, and AI tools that adapt to team patterns. |
New Additions and Trends in 2025
Practice/Trend | Details |
---|---|
AI-Human Hybrid Workflow | AI provides initial analysis; humans focus on complex decisions. GitHub Copilot offers instant AI feedback while waiting for human review. |
Security-First Review Culture | Security reviews are prioritized; Security Level Agreements (SLAs) define vulnerability detection and resolution times; focus on OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities. |
Multi-Model AI Integration | Use of multiple AI models (e.g., Claude 3.7 Sonnet, OpenAI o1, Google Gemini 2.0 Flash) for specialized review tasks. |
Real-Time Collaborative Review | Platforms support real-time sessions, AI PR summaries, chat-based discussions, and instant feedback loops to minimize delays. |
Company-Specific Practices (2025)
Company | Distinct Practices |
---|---|
Continuous improvement over perfection, data-driven decisions, escalation for conflicts, lightweight/fast AI-assisted reviews. | |
Meta/Facebook | AI-driven testing, shift-left approach, automated regression testing, feature flags, dark launches, canary deployments for production testing. |
Amazon | Enhanced CodeGuru Security, security-focused best practices, integrated automation for review orchestration. |
ByteDance/TikTok | BitsAI-CR system (75% accuracy), two-stage architecture (RuleChecker, ReviewFilter), metric tracking (Outdated Rate). |
Apple | Uses iOS-specific tools (SwiftLint, Danger) for code review. |
Netflix | Infrastructure-as-code review practices for cloud-native architecture. |
Modern Tools and Technologies (2025)
Tool/Platform | Purpose/Features |
---|---|
GitHub Copilot Code Review | AI-powered, integrated into GitHub, provides instant suggestions and one-click fixes. |
Codacy | Automated quality gates, supports 40+ languages. |
DeepCode by Snyk | Security-focused AI code analysis. |
Amazon CodeWhisperer | AWS-integrated code assistance. |
Bito's AI Code Review Agent | Context-aware recommendations, incremental review. |
CodeAnt AI | SOC2/HIPAA compliant, reduces review time by 50%. |
SonarQube | Enhanced security vulnerability detection. |
Danger | Automated enforcement of routine review rules. |
Key Challenges and Considerations (2025)
Challenge | Description |
---|---|
AI Tool Integration | Balancing AI automation with human expertise. |
Security Compliance | Meeting stricter regulatory and security requirements. |
Scale Management | Handling reviews across very large developer teams. |
Tool Fragmentation | Managing multiple specialized review tools. |
False Positive Reduction | Improving AI accuracy to minimize unnecessary alerts. |
Security-Focused Practices
Aspect | Practice |
---|---|
Security Reviews | Prioritize high-risk code (auth, data), early SAST/SCA tool integration, focus on OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities. |
SLAs | Define detection and resolution times for vulnerabilities. |
Automated Scans | Integrate automated security scans into code review pipelines. |
AI & Automation Metrics
Metric/Feature | Value/Impact |
---|---|
BitsAI-CR Review Accuracy | 75% |
Outdated Rate (BitsAI-CR) | 26.7% |
User Satisfaction | 74.5% |
CodeAnt AI Review Time | 50% reduction |